DOJ to Push for Google’s Chrome Browser Divestiture in Antitrust Case
According to Bloomberg News, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is preparing to ask a federal judge to compel Alphabet Inc.’s Google to sell its Chrome internet browser. This potential move, part of a broader set of remedies, aims to curtail Google’s alleged monopoly in the search and digital advertising markets. The DOJ is also seeking measures targeting Google’s artificial intelligence (AI) operations and its Android smartphone operating system.
Chrome at the Heart of Google’s Ecosystem
Google’s Chrome browser, which commands an estimated two-thirds of the global market, is a cornerstone of the company’s dominance in online search and advertising. Chrome integrates seamlessly with Google’s search engine by default, gathering critical user data that drives its highly targeted advertising business. Critics argue that this integration forms a self-reinforcing monopoly, granting Google undue control over internet access and ad visibility.
The DOJ’s focus on Chrome follows an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, who found that Google had unlawfully monopolized the search market. Judge Mehta has scheduled a trial in April 2025 to review the DOJ’s proposed remedies, with a final decision anticipated by August.
Google Pushes Back
Lee-Anne Mulholland, vice president of Google Regulatory Affairs, criticized the DOJ’s actions, calling them a “radical agenda that goes far beyond the legal issues in this case” and warning of potential harm to consumers. Google defends its practices, asserting that its search engine’s success stems from superior quality. The company also highlights the availability of alternatives like Microsoft Bing and Amazon, arguing that users have competitive choices.
Political Implications and Broader Antitrust Concerns
The DOJ’s push represents one of the Biden administration’s most aggressive efforts to rein in Big Tech monopolies. However, the case’s trajectory could depend heavily on the 2024 presidential election outcome. Former President Donald Trump has expressed conflicting views—first vowing to prosecute Google for alleged political bias, then questioning the rationale behind breaking up the company.
Potential Remedies
Prosecutors are considering a range of remedies, from terminating exclusive agreements where Google pays billions annually to Apple and others to maintain its default search engine status, to dismantling key parts of its business, such as Chrome and the Android operating system. Chrome’s dominance makes it a vital revenue driver for Google, and divesting it would significantly disrupt the company’s operations.
What’s Next?
While the DOJ is advocating for structural remedies, it may delay the decision on a Chrome sale until other measures are implemented to foster a competitive market. Google, on the other hand, is expected to appeal any ruling that mandates divestiture.
Global Implications for Big Tech
The case highlights growing scrutiny of Big Tech’s market power, as regulators and lawmakers worldwide grapple with its impact on competition, innovation, and consumer choice. The outcome could set a precedent for antitrust enforcement in the digital economy.