Biden Approves Ukraine’s Use of U.S. Missiles to Strike Deep into Russia, Igniting Moscow’s Fury
President Biden’s decision to allow Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied long-range missiles for strikes deep into Russian territory represents a significant policy shift, sparking fierce condemnation from Moscow. Russian lawmakers warned the move could escalate into a global conflict, with some describing it as a step toward “the third world war.”
The authorization grants Ukraine access to U.S.-made ATACMS missiles capable of hitting targets nearly 200 miles away. Until now, Ukraine’s attacks inside Russia had been limited to less powerful, non-U.S. weaponry, such as drones. This shift comes as Kyiv faces intensified missile attacks from Moscow, including a weekend assault that left dozens of civilians dead in northern and southern Ukraine.
A Turning Point in U.S. Policy
After months of resistance, the Biden administration reversed its stance in the face of Russian escalations, including increased missile strikes and the deployment of North Korean troops to aid Russia’s forces. The timing of the decision is critical, with President-elect Trump set to take office in two months, signaling a likely shift in U.S. policy toward prioritizing negotiations over military support. Analysts believe Biden’s move aims to strengthen Ukraine before this transition.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy welcomed the decision, stating, “The missiles will speak for themselves.” However, he acknowledged the challenges ahead and emphasized the urgency of securing a diplomatic resolution to the nearly three-year conflict.
Moscow’s Reaction: Escalation Fears
Russian officials reacted angrily to the U.S. policy shift. Senior lawmaker Leonid Slutsky accused Biden of aiming to end his presidency as “Bloody Joe.” Senator Vladimir Dzhabarov warned of catastrophic consequences, and state media accused NATO of provoking a direct confrontation with Russia.
President Vladimir Putin, who previously warned that allowing Ukraine to strike Russian territory with U.S. weapons would pull NATO into the conflict, has escalated his efforts. Moscow recently deployed over 11,000 North Korean troops to reinforce its positions in the Kursk region, part of which Ukrainian forces briefly reclaimed earlier this year.
Balancing the War’s Dynamics
While the ATACMS deployment bolsters Ukraine’s military capabilities, experts caution against overstating its impact. James Nixey of Chatham House noted that if the missiles are restricted to targeting Russian positions in the Kursk region—where North Korean troops are stationed—their broader effect on the war may be limited. This measured approach could extend the conflict rather than provide a decisive resolution.
“The U.S. remains cautious, ensuring Ukraine can defend itself while avoiding actions that could provoke a wider war,” Nixey explained.
A Critical Moment for Ukraine
Ukraine’s leaders have long advocated for the ability to strike deeper into Russia, arguing it is essential to counter Moscow’s attacks on civilian infrastructure. Russian missile strikes over the weekend—including a ballistic missile attack on the northern city of Sumy that killed 11 people, including two children—highlight the urgency of Ukraine’s appeals.
Zelenskyy is balancing military strategy with diplomatic outreach, aware that Trump’s administration may prioritize a negotiated settlement over Ukraine’s territorial ambitions. The coming months are pivotal as Kyiv seeks to strengthen its position before potential shifts in U.S. support.
A Precarious Path Ahead
The decision to provide ATACMS represents a bold, calculated risk for the U.S. Whether it serves to deter Moscow or escalates the conflict remains uncertain. The policy shift could lead to a more intense confrontation or, if successful, significantly alter the war’s trajectory in Ukraine’s favor. The Biden administration’s move underscores the delicate balance of empowering Ukraine while mitigating risks of a broader global conflict.